This week has been another eventful one for me and my AP Research project. Personally, I got a job at Raising Cane's, so come on down and have some chicken fingers. With my new job, I have had a little less time to fool around during the day. But the time dedicated to my research project has not really changed. This week, we gathered the results and analyzed them and now we are moving on to writing the results section. So in order to get a better understanding of how our results section should look, we have looked at other results sections from other studies that used similar methods. I am going to go through three different studies and note what I saw in their results sections and then I will hopefully be able to find the commonalities that I can use for my own results section.
1. The Near-Miss Effect in Blackjack: Group Play and Lone Play by Gunnarsson, Whiting, and Dixon
This study had participants play blackjack hands and rate each hand they got on a scale of 1 to 10. In order to show the average rating of each participant for each possible hand, they used a few bar graphs the mapped the hand rating vs the distance from 21. The study then did statistical analysis on the numbers to see if they were significant and they showed those in a table as well. It then explained the statistical calculations and how they showed that people changed their average hand rating after the near-miss effect was induced.
2. The Effect of Time Pressure on Consumer Choice Deferral by Dhar and Nowlis
The study had participants choose between risky and safe choice or defer choice to a later time while under time pressure or no time pressure conditions. The results section consisted of a table recording what people chose under time pressure vs no time pressure and the percentage of people who chose anything at all under both conditions. The paper then detailed the observations of the experimenters and discussed the statistical significance of the numbers they found. It explained that it was not by chance that more people deferred choice during the time pressure condition.
3. Priming Motivation Through Unattended Speech by Radel, Sarrazin, Jehu, and Pelletier
The study was investigating auditory priming's effect on people's motivation and actions. The results section consisted of a bar graph showing the change in motivation to do activities between primed and unprimed groups. It then explained what the results meant. Next it showed a table with the change in word choice between primed and unprimed groups. It then explained the statistical significance and showed why the auditory priming was actually affecting the behavior of the subjects.
Though looking at many different sections and coming up with an idea is daunting at first, breaking it down helped me come up with an idea for my results section. Since all the studies used graphs, and mostly bar graphs, I should use bar graphs along with tables to show my change in betting caused by each of the effects. I need to explain what the bar graphs mean and how we can draw conclusions from them. But in order to draw any meaningful conclusions, I will have to fully explain all the statistics I did to show significance and calculate all of the numbers in my experiment. I think I have a pretty good idea of what I am going to do, but I will make any necessary changes as next week goes on. I'm excited to see my experiment and research paper begin to take its final shape. (608)